By dividing the sleep times, you obtain that the values get checked for changes a lot faster, and you can have a confirmation by printing or blinking a led or whatever, that the new values have kicked in. I probably couldn't stand having to wait up to 12 hours to see if my settings have changedAny particular reason? I don't see any benefit. Low overhead.With very long durations, I would suggest to divide the sleep time and check more often if the time has changed instead of waiting for the next iteration
This was just an example
I don't think that overhead is a problem here, as the system is only sleeping, and the commands are minimal.
Statistics: Posted by kheylen25 — Sun Jan 26, 2025 8:09 am